检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周晓爽[1] 李婷婷[2] 顾雪非[2] 向国春[2] 王云屏[2] 毛正中[2] 张振忠[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学,哈尔滨150086 [2]卫生部卫生发展研究中心,北京100191
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2013年第8期50-52,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:卫生部规划财务司委托医改背景下农村医疗机构补偿机制研究
摘 要:目的:评价基本药物零差率销售对降低医药费用的效果,为完善相关政策提供依据。方法:运用描述性分析方法,对调查地区基本药物零差率销售前后医疗机构经济运行及医药费用情况进行对比分析。结果:未实行基本药物零差率销售的县级医疗机构次均费用持续上涨,实行零差率销售的乡村两级医疗机构的次均费用下降,但基层医疗机构用药能力受到限制,且零差率销售后的补偿政策未能充分调动医疗服务提供者的积极性,使得患者向上级医院转移,影响政策效果。建议:应保证基层医疗机构的用药能力,满足群众基本用药,合理激励医疗服务提供者。Objective: To evaluate the impact of essential medicine Zero Markup sale on the medical expenditure reduction and provide references for the implement of relevant policy. Methods: Using descriptive method to compare and analyze the economic operation of medical institutions and the medical expenditure before and after Zero Markup policy. Results: The average cost of county level hospital which did not implement Zero Markup policy continues to rise, while the cost decreases after application of the sale policy. However, the basic medicine institution's capacity of using medicine is limited, and the compensation policy after Zero Markup policy could not completely encourage the enthusiasm of medical service providers, lead the patients transfer to upper-hospitals and influence the policy impact. Suggestion: It is necessary to ensure the capacity of basic medical institutions applying medicine, meet the residents' demand of medicine and reasonably encourage the medical service provider' s enthusiasm.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31