检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]仲恺农业工程学院人工环境与控制研究所,广州510225 [2]佛山市浩特普尔人工环境设备有限公司,佛山528225
出 处:《建筑科学》2013年第8期90-92,98,共4页Building Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51178477)
摘 要:土壤源热泵空调系统的可持续发展能力需要从经济、社会和环境效益几个方面作定量分析。本文以武汉某办公楼的暖通空调工程为例,将土壤源热泵和空气源热泵、风冷冷水机组+燃油锅炉等3种常用的冷热源方案进行了可持续发展能力的比较评价。结果表明,与风冷冷水机组+燃油锅炉系统和空气源热泵系统等2种系统相比,土壤源热泵系统的能值产出率并没有优势,经济竞争力较差,但它给环境的压力最小,其能值可持续指数较高,可维持较长时间内的可持续发展。Quantitative analysis is required to be conducted on the sustainable development capacity of air conditioning system of ground-source heat pump from economic,social and environmental benefits.This paper takes HVAC engineering in a certain office building of Wuhan for example and compares as well as evaluates the sustainable development capacity of the 2 commonly used cold and heat source schemes of ground-source heat pump and air source heat pump,air-cooled chiller unit+oil burning boiler,etc.The results show that the emergy output capacity of ground-source heat pump system lacks superiority and is poor in economic competitiveness compared with the 2 systems of air-cooled chiller unit+oil burning boiler system and air source heat pump system,but it exerts minimum pressure on the environment,with relatively high sustainable index of emergy,and is capable of maintaining sustainable development for a relatively long time.
分 类 号:TK521.2[动力工程及工程热物理—热能工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.179.20