体育仲裁裁决的机构审查制  

Institutional Scrutiny of Award in Sport Arbitration

作　　者：张春良[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学国际法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2013年第3期245-250,共6页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目编号:11YJC820161)

摘　　要：仲裁庭是裁决者,仲裁机构是服务者,这是仲裁的基本定律。CAS等仲裁机构对裁决的形式,以及不可避免地对裁决的实体执行审查,涉嫌对自身法律地位的僭越。机构审查裁决得到司法机关的正面支持,并在实践中有利于提升裁决品质,积极回应当事人的期望,坚持有节制的审查原则,特别有助于矫正体育仲裁个性所致的内在问题。机构审查裁决不是危机,而是反思和变革仲裁机构法律地位的契机。应将仲裁机构从服务者的传统定位调整为仲裁的消极担保者,据此既能回应现实,又能为机构审查裁决的职能变迁提供正当依据。我国拟议中的体育仲裁机构也当如此定位,有理、有利、有节地实施裁决审查等机制。It is a basic law that the tribunal decides the case while institution provides it with services. CAS and other institutions may violate the basic law due to their scrutiny of not only the form but also the substance of an award. The scrutiny has received the positive supports from national courts, enhanced the quality of awards, responded to the parties＇ expectation, adopted moderate attitude, and particularly been helpful to offset inherent defects of sport arbitration. That implies the institutional scrutiny is not a crisis, but art opportunity to reflect and revolutionize the legal status of the arbitral institution. The adjustment from service provider to passive guarantor could respond to the practice and legitimize the functional change of institutional scrutiny. The prospective Chinese Court of Arbitration for Sport should be so established, and reasonably, beneficially, and moderately undertake the mission of institutional scrutiny.

关 键 词：体育仲裁 仲裁裁决 裁决审查 国际体育仲裁院 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]