检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]潮州市中心医院内科门诊部,广东潮州521000
出 处:《现代临床护理》2013年第4期52-55,共4页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨传统清洁灌肠法和改良清洁灌肠法的效果。方法采用单盲法将180例需行清洁灌肠的患者分为实验组和对照组,每组各90例。对照组采用传统清洁灌肠方法,实验组采用改良清洁灌肠方法。比较两组患者灌肠效果,灌肠总次数及不良反应发生的差异。结果实验组患者灌肠效果优于对照组,清洁灌肠次数和不良反应发生率低于对照组,两组比较,均P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论改良清洁灌肠法能有效地提高清洁灌肠质量,使患者更安全、舒适。Objective To study the clinical effects of the traditional cleaning enema and the improved enema.Methods One hundred and eighty patients undergoing cleaning enema were randomly divided into the control group and the experiment group in equal number.The two groups were compared in terms of the effects,time of cleaning enema and adverse reactions.Results The experiment group was better than the control group concerning enema effects(P 0.05).The times of cleaning enema and the incidence of adverse reaction in the experiment group were fewer than the control group(P 0.05).Conclusion The improved cleaning enema could efficiently raise the cleaning enema effect so that the patient feel safer and more comfortable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229