中美版权教唆引诱侵权比较研究  

The Comparative Study of Lured Tort in Copyright Law between China and USA

作　　者：徐铭勋[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2013年第6期86-90,共5页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：版权教唆引诱侵权是著作权间接侵权的一种。在版权教唆引诱侵权的认定上,教唆引诱行为人的主观故意是该间接侵权行为的成立要件。美国通过判例发展了有关教唆引诱侵权认定的若干理论,对教唆引诱行为人的主观故意认定是关键环节。中国法院也历来将教唆引诱行为人的主观故意作为重要的侵权要件加以详尽考察和论证,但法释[2012]20号文件第7条的出台,导致实践中法院将网络服务提供者在网站上推介技术支持、奖励积分的行为直接等同为网络服务提供者对用户上传侵权作品实施诱导和鼓励,忽略对教唆引诱行为人主观故意状态的考察。这一规定的合理性值得商榷。The abetter＇s subjective state is an essential establishment requirement of the lured tort in copyright, which is one kind of the indirect copyright infringements. In the Unite States, courts developed many theories on how to judge the lured tort, in which the abetter＇s subjective state is the key element. In China, judges argue the abetter＇s subjective state as an important constitution element of the lured tort in detail in judgments in the past. However, with the Fashi 2012 No.20 Art.7 issued, some courts consider certain behavior of internet service providers, such as recommendation of technical support and bonus points, as their inducement to encourage Internet users to upload works charged with infringement, neglecting the investigation of the abetter＇s subjective state. We should reconsider whether this new rule is proper or not.

关 键 词：版权 教唆引诱侵权 主观故意 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学] D923