检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张华民[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学,江苏南京210093
出 处:《行政与法》2013年第1期27-33,共7页Administration and Law
摘 要:行政问责法治化体现的是多数人的意志,其价值追求在于公众权利或公民权利的实现和保障。我国行政问责法治化的现实困境在于:法治化问责所要求的问责文化缺失、问责理念错位、问责体制不畅和问责制度滞后。我国行政问责法治化的实现路径在于:突出权利本位,塑造问责文化;保障公众参与,更新问责理念;强化权力制约,健全问责体制;加快统一立法,完善问责制度。The rule of law of administrative accountability embodies the will of the majority and its value lies in the pursuit of the realization and protection of the public rights or civil fights.The main dilemmas of the rule of law of administrative Accountability in China lie in:lack of culture,dislocation of concept,defect of system and lag of specification that the rule of law of accountability requires.The main routes lie in:to shape a culture of accountability by highlighting the fights-based,to update the concept of ac- countability by protecting public participation,to improve accountability system by strengthening the power-constraint and better specification by speeding up the harmonization of legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222