中文版CRS-R量表的信效度研究  

Study on reliability and validity for Chinese version of CRS-R Scale

作　　者：张瑛[1] 何敏慧[2] 赵发林[2] 冯国和[1] 王为民[1] 裘五四[1] 胡侠翔[1] 程丽娟[2] 王付言[2] 聂云志[2] 朱一君[2] 喻森明[3] 胡晓华[3] 余丹[3] 李景琦[3] 谢康民[2] Schnakers C 狄海波[2] 

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学附属医院,浙江杭州310015 [2]杭州师范大学国际植物状态和意识科学研究所,浙江杭州310036 [3]武警浙江总队杭州医院康复中心,浙江杭州310054 [4]比利时列日大学昏迷科学团队

出　　处：《护理与康复》2013年第8期715-717,721,共4页Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation

基　　金：浙江省科技厅重大项目;编号:2008C14098;杭州师范大学中青年支持计划资助;编号:PD11002010002016;浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目;编号:2013KYB213

摘　　要：目的验证中文版本CRS-R量表在植物状态或最小意识状态患者评估中的信效度。方法应用中文版CRS-R量表与格拉斯哥量表对103例植物状态或最小意识状态患者的意识进行评估,分析中文版CRS-R量表的内部一致性、评定者间一致性、同时效度以及诊断敏感性。结果中文版CRS-R量表内部一致性比较好,Cronbach’sα系数=0.866;评定者间的一致性分析结果表现中等(P<0.05);对患者同时用中文版CRS-R量表和格拉斯哥量表的测评总分显著相关(Spearman r>0.7);在诊断的敏感性上表现较好(P<0.05)。结论植物状态或最小意识状态患者可采用中文版CRS-R量表评估。Objective To verify the reliability and validity of Chinese version of CRS-R Scale for patients in vegetative state or minimally conscious state.Method Assess 103patients in vegetative state or minimally conscious state by Chinese version of CRS-R Scale and Glasgow scale.Analyze internal and inter-observer consistency,concurrent validity and diagnostic sensitivity of Chinese version of CRS-R Scale.Result Internal consistency for Chinese version of CRS-R Scale is nice,Cronbachαcoefficient=0.866.Analysis on inter-observer consistency is in medium level（P0.05）.There is obvious correlation on results between Chinese version of CRS-R Scale and Glasgow scale（Spearman r0.7）.Performance on diagnostic sensitivity of Chinese version of CRS-R Scale is nice（P0.05）.Conclusion Patients in vegetative state or minimally conscious state can be assessed by Chinese version of CRS-R Scale.

关 键 词：意识障碍 植物状态 意识状态 意识量表 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]