检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田惠萍[1] 林卫琼 郑华[1] 陈晖[1] 黎小群[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳市第二人民医院 [2]广东省深圳市急救中心
出 处:《护理研究(中旬版)》2013年第8期2473-2475,共3页Chinese Nursing Researsh
基 金:深圳市科技局立项课题;编号:201203037
摘 要:[目的]观察两种不同换药方法对Ⅱ度烧伤创面的影响。[方法]将120例Ⅱ度烧伤病人按入选顺序单、双号分为观察组和对照组,在常规清创消毒的基础上,观察组采用分层换药法,对照组采用传统换药法。观察两组换药时疼痛程度、出血率、创面愈合时间、治愈1%烧伤创面所需费用。[结果]观察组创面疼痛程度、出血率、创面愈合时间及费用均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]分层换药法用于Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗,能减轻换药时的疼痛,有效促进创面的愈合,降低治疗费用,减轻护士工作量,效果优于传统换药法。Objective:To observe influence of two different ways of dressing on degree Ⅱ burn wounds.Methods:A total of 120 cases of patients withⅡdegree burn were divided into observation group and control group according to single,double number in selected sequence.On the basis of regular debridement and disinfection,observation group patients used layering dressing,control group patients used traditional dressing,then to observe degree of pain during dressing,bleeding rate,wound healing time and cost of cure 1% burn requirements.Results:Degree of wound pain,bleeding rate,wound healing times and costs in observation group were lower than that of control group,there was a statistically significant difference(P0.05).Conclusion:Layering dressing used in treating patients withⅡdegree burn wound can reduce pain when dressing,effectively promote wound healing,reduce the cost of treatment and workload of nurses,its effect is better than that of traditional dressing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.126.147