检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李婧[1]
出 处:《吉林工程技术师范学院学报》2013年第6期7-9,共3页Journal of Jilin Engineering Normal University
摘 要:反垄断民事救济制度具有保护垄断行为受害者、防范政府失灵与推动反垄断法实施的功能,但我国《反垄断法》对民事救济制度的规定相当模糊,仅在第五十条中简略规定,我国反垄断法民事救济制度仍存在大量的空白和缺陷。本文从民事救济的概念、功能及缺陷着手,针对我国当前反垄断民事救济制度的缺陷,在损害赔偿制度的完善、禁令救济的增加、原告资格的界定以及举证责任的明确等方面提出相应的完善措施。The anti-monopoly civil remedy system is to protect the victims of monopoly behavior,prevent government failure and promote the implementation of the anti-monopoly law,but the provision towards civil relief system in China's "Anti-monopoly Law" is vague,only briefly formulated in the fiftieth item,there are lots of gaps and defects in the civil relief system of China's Anti-monopoly Law.This paper,starting form The concept,function and the defects of the civil relief,aiming at the defects of China's current anti-monopoly civil relief system,puts forward corresponding measures for improvement in the aspects of the perfection of damage compensation system,the increase of injunctive relief,the demarcation of the plaintiff qualification and explicitness of burden of proof.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.98.87