“985工程”高校学报在不同数据库中评价指标对比分析  

Comparative Analysis on Evaluating Indication in Different Database to “985 Engineering” University Journal

作　　者：郝秀清[1] 姚佳良[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学学报(自然科学版)编辑部,山东淄博255091

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2013年第17期76-80,共5页Science and Technology Management Research

摘　　要：为了使读者、作者、办刊人全面客观地看待期刊在不同数据库中的评价指标,对20种"985工程"高校主办并冠以校名的自然科学版学报在万方、维普数据库中的影响因子、被引频次、期刊他引率3个指标进行统计分析。结果表明:20种学报的这3个统计指标在两大数据库中的排名结果有较大差别,统计源的差别可能会使统计结果不能真正反映某一期刊在同类期刊中的学术地位和作用。对期刊进行评价时,必须科学、客观地使用数据库中的评价指标。In order to make readers, authors, magazine people treat the evaluating indicators of the journal in different da tabase comprehensively and objectively, three indicators such as influence factors, total cites and cited rate of the journal in Wanfang and VIP database for twenty kinds journals of natural science edition sponsored and given name by ＂985 Project＂ university were statislically analyzed. The resuhs showed that： the ranking results of three statistical indicators of twenty kinds journals in two database were quite different, the difference between statistical sources might make statistical results unable to truly reflect the academic status and rule of a journal in similar journals. Evaluating indicators in database must be used scientifically and objectively when journals were evaluated.

关 键 词：传播学 评价指标 统计分析 高校学报 

分 类 号：G353.2[文化科学—情报学]