检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张磊[1] 郝莉[1] 张旭慧[1] 廖云华 陈建春[1] 王强[1]
机构地区:[1]杭州市疾病预防控制中心,浙江杭州310021 [2]环境保护部华东核与辐射安全监督站
出 处:《疾病监测》2013年第8期692-696,共5页Disease Surveillance
摘 要:目的评价2009-2012年杭州市职业病网络报告质量,并对工作中发现的问题提出对策。方法采用报告率、漏报率、迟报率、准确率等指标,评价2009-2012年杭州市职业病网络报告数据质量。结果 2009-2012年全市职业病网络报告的报告卡数量、报告率、准确率呈现逐年增加趋势,而报告卡漏报率、迟报率呈现逐年降低趋势。自2011年起全市职业病网络报告的报告率、漏报率、迟报率均已达标,但报告卡准确率未达标。结论职业病网络报告系统软件功能与职业病网络报告管理工作还存在不足。应继续加强全市职业病网络报告质量管理,并探索新的职业病网络报告质量综合评价指标。Objective To evaluate the quality of network direct reporting of occupational diseases in Hangzhou from 2009 to 2012 and provide evidence for the improvement of the occupational hazard surveillance system. Methods The analysis was conducted on the reporting rate, underreporting rate, delayed reporting rate and accurate rate of occupational diseases through this surveiUance system in Hangzhou during this period. Results The reporting cards, reporting rate and accurate rate increased with year, but the delayed reporting rate and underreporting rate decreased with year. Since 2011 the reporting rate, the underreporting rate and the delayed reporting rate have met the requirements except the accurate rate. Conclusion Problems still exist in the software functions of the direct network reporting system of occupational diseases and the management of direct network reporting. It is still necessary to strengthen the quality of the direct network reporting of occupational diseases and explore the new comprehensive reporting quality evaluation indictors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3