检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘伟伟[1] 李军[2] 王广丽[1] 王忠周[2] 罗毅[2]
机构地区:[1]山东中医药大学附属医院放射科,山东济南250011 [2]山东省千佛山医院影像科,山东济南250014
出 处:《中国辐射卫生》2013年第4期388-390,395,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiological Health
基 金:山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2011HW062);山东省医药卫生青年项目(2011QW020)
摘 要:目的分析比较VolumeRAD成像技术与CT的图像质量及辐射剂量,选择合适的X射线检查方式,更好地为临床应用。方法利用体模获取VolumeRAD成像技术、CT的图像并记录各自的辐射剂量。结果 Vol-umeRAD成像技术的低对比分辨力在对比度1%时为4 mm,对比度0.5%时为7 mm,对比度0.3%时为0 mm;高对比分辨力为9 lp/cm;辐射剂量1.26 mGy。CT的低对比分辨力在对比度1%时为2 mm,对比度0.5%时为4 mm,对比度0.3%时为6 mm;高对比分辨力7 lp/cm;辐射剂量28 mGy。结论 VolumeRAD成像技术的图像克服了DR的组织结构重叠,与CT相比,其高对比分辨力高,低对比分辨力低,但其辐射剂量远低于CT,且具有经济、简便、诊断价值强的特点。Objective To study comparatively the imaging quality and radiation doses between VolumeRAD and CT in order to chose appropriate X - ray examination method for clinic. Methods To get VolumeRAD and CT images by the mod- ule and recorded each radiation doses. Results Low contrast resolutions were 4 mm ,7 mm and 0 mm when contrast were 1%, 0.5% and 0.3% respectively, and high contrast resolution was 9 lp/cm and radiation dose was 1.26 mGy in Vol- umeRAD, while in CT, low contrast resolutions were 2 mm,4 mm and 6 mm when contrast were 1% ,0.5% and 0.3% re-spectively and high contrast resolution was 7 lp/cm and radiation dose was 28 mGy. Conclusion VolumeRAD overcomes the overlaying structures of body tissues in DR and possesses higher high contrast resolution and lower low contrast resolution and much lower radiation dose compared with CT, which has economic, simple and high diagnostic value features.
关 键 词:VolumeRAD成像技术 DR CT 图像质量 辐射剂量
分 类 号:R144.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56