检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济研究院,100029
出 处:《国际贸易问题》2013年第9期74-81,共8页Journal of International Trade
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目《我国新一轮对外开放的战略布局、主要目标与政策选择研究》(11&ZD007)阶段成果
摘 要:2013年3月,中日韩FTA进行了第一轮谈判。在后续谈判中,如何开放服务业将是除货物贸易之外各方关注的一个焦点。本文采用联合国贸发会议(UNCTAD)的基础数据,以服务贸易作为分析视角,重点测算了2002-2011年中日韩三国服务业的国际竞争力指标即净出口指数(TC)、显示性比较优势指数(RCA)和显示性竞争优势指数(CA),据此分析了中日韩三国服务贸易的整体竞争力和分部门竞争力,得出结论认为:三国虽然都是服务贸易大国,但并非强国,整体竞争力不足,各部门竞争力比较优势较为相似,因此,中国在FTA谈判中应该重点关注三国都具有竞争优势的部门,渐进地开放服务业市场。In March 2013, the first round of FTA negotiation between China, Japan and South Korea unfolded. In the subsequent negotiations, the issue "how to open up trade in services" would be the central point drawing the attention from all parties involved. This paper uses UNCTAD data and calculates a few in- ternational competitiveness indicators for China, Japan and South Korea from 2002 to 2011. These indicators include Net Export index (TC), Revealed Compar- ative Advantage index (RCA) and Competitive Advantage index (CA). On this ba- sis, we respectively inspect the overall and sub-sector competitiveness of CJK in services trade. The results show that in the CJK FTA negotiation, China should start by opening some sectors such as construction, tourism, computer and infor- mation services, followed by opening sectors such as "other business services" and "personal, cultural and recreational services" . A cautious attitude must be taken when opening financial and insurance sectors. At the same time, China should urge Japan and South Korea to open their tourism, communications, com- puter and information services industries in which China have competitive advan- tages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.79.7