检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高伟[1] 路平[1] 孟庆恒[1] 苏兰海[1] 孙明礼[1]
出 处:《实用疼痛学杂志》2013年第2期91-96,共6页Pain Clinic Journal
摘 要:目的观察阻抗与温度监测下射频热凝靶点消融术在治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的临床疗效。方法腰椎间盘突出症患者110例,随机分为两组,每组55例,其中A组在阻抗、温度监测下行射频热凝靶点消融术治疗,B组采取常规保守治疗。治疗前后行VAS评分,观察临床疗效。结果治疗后两组VAS评分较治疗前均明显下降。治疗后1d、1周、1个月、3个月时优良率分别为76.4%(42/55例)、70.9%(39/55例)、89.1%(49/55例)、90.9%(50/55例),B组为10.9%(6/55例)、50.9%(28/55例)、63.6%(35/55例)、65.5%(36/55例),同时点A组优良率高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论阻抗与温度监测下射频热凝靶点消融术治疗腰椎间盘突出症安全有效。Objective To observe the therapeutic effects of target ablation with radiofrequency thermocoagulation.in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation under impedance and tem- perature monitoring. Methods One hundred and ten patients with lumbar intervertebral disc hernia- tion were randomly divided into two groups, 55 cases in each. Patients in group A received radiofrequency thermocoagulation ablation under irapedance and temperature monitoring, and patients in group B received conventional conservative treatment. VAS and clinical efficacy were evaluated. Results VAS was significantly lower after the treatment than that in pre-treatment in both groups. The effective rates were 76.4%(42/55 cases), 70.9%(39/55 cases), 89.1%(49/55 cases), 90.9% (50/55 cases) respectively in group A and 10.9% (6/55 cases), 50.9% (28/55 cases), 63.6% (35/ 55 cases), 65.5%(36/55 cases) respectively in group B on the first day, 1 week, 1 month and the third month after the treatment (P〈0.05). Conclusion The method of target ablation with radiofrequency tbermocoagulation under impedance and temperature monitoring is safe and effective for the treatment of lumbar disc intervertebral herniation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200