论实质法律推理对司法的意义  

Practical Legal Reasoning in the Judicial Process

作　　者：强昌文[1] 张萍[1] 黄祖旺 

机构地区：[1]东莞理工学院政法学院,广东东莞523808 [2]池州市人民检察院,安徽池州247100

出　　处：《东莞理工学院学报》2013年第4期19-26,共8页Journal of Dongguan University of Technology

基　　金：国家社科基金课题"软法及其相关问题研究"(11BFX018);东莞理工学院课题"社会治理的软法机制研究"阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：司法推理是法官在具体的案件中,通过适用法律,认定案件事实,进行综合考虑,从而得出司法判决的过程。其中包括多种推理形式,如形式推理和实质推理等。纯粹的形式法律推理具有很多缺陷,在实践中,司法活动为谋求法律效果、政治效果和社会效果的统一,实质法律推理备受司法者的重视。司法的实践理性、司法的不确定性,决定了实质法律推理的核心地位。Judicial reasoning is the process that the judge in specific cases ascertains that facts of the case,and takes them into general consideration so as to achieve judicial decision on the basis of applicable law.It includes various forms of Judicial reasoning,such as Formal legal reasoning and Practical legal reasoning.There are a lot of defects in the pure formal legal reasoning.However,in practice,Practical legal reasoning is paid much attention by the judiciary owing to judicial activities seeking the unification among legal,political and social effects.Judicial practical reason and judicial uncertainty determine the core of substantive legal reasoning.

关 键 词：形式法律推理 实质法律推理 实践理性 

分 类 号：DF03[政治法律—法学理论]