检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李益民[1]
出 处:《东莞理工学院学报》2013年第4期34-36,共3页Journal of Dongguan University of Technology
摘 要:共同加害责任的构成要件上,除要有侵权行为、损害事实、因果关系等外,理论和司法实践还特别强调主、客观上存在的"共同"要素,这直接涉及对加害行为的性质确定及责任分配。对行为人的主观关联,现已有基本共识,但对客观关联仍存在不同看法,如何认定客观关联要素及针对《人身损害赔偿适用解释》的规定,是否要坚持"同一损害后果"。本文通过解析共同加害行为的客观关联要素,以期进一步厘清承担连带责任的缘由。Among elements of joint injuries responsibility,in addition to violations,damage facts and causality,theory and judicial practice also emphasizes the existence of "common" elements on the subjective and objective levels,which directly involves identifying the nature of the harm act and allocation of responsibilities.The subjective connection of conduct has been commonly approved by people,but there are some different opinions about the elements of objective connection,such as how to identify the objective connecting elements and how to comply with the provision of the Applied Interpretation on Compensation of Personal Injury and whether we adhere to "the consequences of the same damage".The paper analyses the elements of objective connection of joint injuries,in order to elaborate the cause of joint liability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7