检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭伟华[1] 韩宏伟[1] 王三娣[1] 闻捷[1] 尚小珂[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉亚洲心脏病医院心外科,湖北武汉430022
出 处:《心脏杂志》2013年第4期421-423,共3页Chinese Heart Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨经食管心房调搏对不同类型房室结折返性心动过速诊断的准确性。方法:收集近5个月经心内电生理检查(标准诊断)确诊为房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)196例,与其食管调搏的诊断进行比较。结果:两种电生理检查诊断慢-快型AVNRT符合率100%,但食管电生理检查对快-慢型AVNRT及慢-慢型AVNRT与起源于心房下部靠间隔的房速不易鉴别。结论:经食管心脏电生理检查对慢-快型AVNRT具确诊价值。对快-慢型或慢-慢型AVNRT容易误诊为房速。AIM:To study the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal pacing in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS: One hundred and ninetysix patients were diagnosed with AVNRT by intracardiac electrophysiology and the results were compared with the findings of esophageal pacing. RESULTS: The coincidence rate of the two methods in diagnosing the slowfast AVNRT was 100%. However, esophageal pacing was not very effective in discriminating the fastslow AVNRT and slowslow AVNRT from atrial tachycardia. CONCLUSION: Esophageal pacing is of high diagnostic value only in the slowfast form of AVNRT. For accurate diagnosis of fastslow AVNRT and slowslow AVNRT, intracardiac electrophysiology should be performed.
关 键 词:心动过速 房室结折返性 经食管心房调搏 心内电生理检查
分 类 号:R541.7[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.211.185