论反规避制度的正当性  

作　　者：臧潇茹[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京102249

出　　处：《对外经贸》2013年第8期34-38,共5页FOREIGN ECONOMIC RELATIONS & TRADE

摘　　要：反规避制度作为反倾销制度的进一步延伸和发展,自"改锥案"起就饱受各国争议。反对者认为它是一项限制竞争的制度,违背GATT和WTO的宗旨;赞成者认为它不仅符合GATT和WTO的宗旨,还有利于防止欺诈。从该制度的公正性和合理性两方面分析反规避制度的正当性。从反对和赞成该制度的两方面权衡来看,该制度符合一般公平理性的规则。从法律经济学角度分析,有充分支撑该制度的理论基础,且该制度对公共利益也未产生消极影响。The rule of anti—circumvention,as the extension of the rule anti-dumping,has aroused heat debat since screwdriver case.The protesters hold that the rule limits the competiton thus it is agaist the principle of WTO / GATT;while those who support the rule argue that it not only embodies the principle of WTO / GATT,but also help prevent deceiving.The passage discuss and analyse the legitimacy of the rule in terms of impartiality and rationality.The impartiality is that the rule accords with the common sense of fairness in the balance of both opposers and holders.The rationality has two halves： one is that the rule has a strong theoretical basis in the field of economics of law;and another is that there’s no side effect on public interests.

关 键 词：反倾销 反规避 WTO 改锥案 

分 类 号：F744[经济管理—国际贸易]