检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属医院麻醉科,广东湛江524001
出 处:《广东医学院学报》2013年第2期136-138,共3页Journal of Guangdong Medical College
摘 要:目的观察萘普生栓联合吗啡硬膜外镇痛在剖宫产术后镇痛效果。方法将123例剖宫产产妇随机分成萘普生栓联合吗啡硬膜外镇痛组(NM组,61例)和单纯吗啡硬膜外镇痛组(M组,62例),比较两组间术后4、8、12、24hVAS评分、以及24h内镇痛泵按压次数和不良反应发生情况。结果 NM组术后4、8、12、24hVAS评分、以及24h内镇痛泵按压次数均明显低于M组(P<0.01或0.05),两组间不良反应差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论萘普生栓联合吗啡硬膜外镇痛在剖宫产术后镇痛效果明显,值得临床应用。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of naproxen suppository and morphine epidural analgesia in post-cesarean pain. Methods A total of 123 pregnant women undergoing cesarean were randomly allocated to naproxen suppositoryplus morphine epidural analgesia (NM group, n=61) or morphine epidural analgesia alone (M group, n=62). VAS scores at 4 h, 8h, 12 h and 24 h, pressing times of analgesia pump within 24 h and adverse events were compared between both groups. ResultsVAS scores at all timepoints and pressing times of analgesia pump within 24 h were lower in NM group than those in M group(P0.01 or 0.05), but there was no difference in adverse events between both groups (P0.05). Conclusion Naproxensuppository plus morphine epidural analgesia is effective for post-cesarean pain and may be worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7