检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学中国教育财政科学研究所 [2]美国西北大学政治学系 [3]浙江大学中国西部发展研究院 [4]复旦大学经济学院
出 处:《社会学研究》2013年第5期26-52,242-243,共27页Sociological Studies
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71273012)对本项研究的资助
摘 要:本文分析了浙江省内部各县市经济政策差异的历史特征及其政治归因。本文认为,浙江不同地区的共产主义革命传统塑造了基层政权中不同的非正式权力结构。解放前建立地方革命武装的地区,本地干部在基层政权中的影响力较强,但他们与上级政治精英的非正式联系疏远,不仅缺乏晋升的机会,而且受到了政治打压。为了长期的政治生存,他们有激励推行保护产权和市场的经济政策,进而使地方经济获得了快速发展。本文利用1952-1998年浙江分县数据检验了上述假说。In this research,we argue that the origin of the spatial variations of local economic policies in Zhejiang province from 1950s to 1990s could be traced back to the revolutionary legacies prior to 1949,which is embodied by the events forged at the critical historical junctures.The hypothesis is that;the revolutionary history prior to 1949 shaped the informal power structures in Zhejiang,which in turn determined the attitudes of local officials toward the capitalistic development under their administration since 1949 until into the 1990s.To be more specific,if a particular locality established its own revolutionary base,and set up its own militaryforces before 1949,local officials were politically powerful but meanwhile they were oppressed in the sense that their factional ties with higher authorities were weak and their political upward mobility was blocked.As a result,local political elites in these places had more incentives and capabilities than they would have otherwise to protect and promote the economic development both in the Maoist era and in the reform era.The hypothesis is supported by the county-level data of Zhejiang from1952 to 1998.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.11