机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院内分泌科,362000 [2]福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院检验科,362000 [3]福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院影像科,362000
出 处:《中华糖尿病杂志》2013年第8期481-485,共5页CHINESE JOURNAL OF DIABETES MELLITUS
基 金:基金项目:泉州市科技计划项目(20LOZ21)
摘 要:目的探讨艾塞那肽对糖调节受损(IGR)肥胖者血胰岛素及血糖的影响。方法选取2011年5月至2012年11月在福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院就诊的75例糖调节受损(IGR)肥胖者为研究对象,其中62例受试者符合入选条件,按基线胰岛素水平分为高胰岛素血症(HIns,32例)与非高胰岛素血症(NHIns,30例)2组,HIns以空腹胰岛素≥15mU/L和(或)口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTr)2h胰岛素≥80mU儿作为切点。测定基线及应用艾塞那肽5d及14d时的空腹与OGTF2h血浆血糖、胰岛素、C肽、体重等指标。以稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)及Gutt胰岛素敏感指数评估胰岛素抵抗及敏感性。同一组治疗前后比较采用配对t检验,组间均数比较采用单因素方差分析,率的比较采用x。检验。结果两组的空腹及OGTr2h血糖在用药5d时较基线下降(t=4.42、9.78、4.00、8.66,均P〈0.05),HIns组空腹胰岛素在用药5d时较基线下降(t=2.07,P〈0.05),OGTr2h胰岛素在用药5d较基线时下降,用药14d较5d时进一步下降(F=24.17,P〈0.05)。HIns组HOMA—IR在用药5d时较基线下降(t=3.27,只〈0.05)。NHIns组HOMA—IR在用药5d及14d时较基线均无下降(均P〉0.05),HIns组Gutt胰岛素敏感指数在用药5d时较基线升高(t=-9.84,P〈0.05),14d时较5d时进一步升高(F=55.96,P、遗0.05)。NHIns组Gutt胰岛素敏感指数在用药5d时较基线升高(t=-4.27,P〈0.05)。HIns组与NHIns组体重在5d时较基线无下降,14d时均较5d时明显下降(t=14.13、12.00,均P〈0.05)。结论IGR肥胖人群短期应用艾塞那肽即可获益调节血糖、改善胰岛素抵抗、控制体重。Objective To investigate the effect of exenatide on serum insulin and plasma glucose in obese subjects with impaired glucose regulation(IGR). Methods A total of 75 obese subjects with IGR were enrolled from May 2011 to November 2012 in Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University. A total of 62 eligible subjects were divided into the hyperinsulinemia group ( HIns, fasting serum insulin t〉 15 mU/L and (or)2-hour serum insulin 〉i 80 mU/L post glucose load, n = 32 ) and the non- hyperinsulinemia group ( NHIns, n = 30 ) by the serum insulin level Fasting and 2h plasma glucose in OG~, insulin , C-peptide and body weight were measured at the baseline, D5 and D14 of exenatide treatment. Insulin resistance was evaluated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) and the gutt insulin sensitivity index. Paired t test was used to test within group change. One-way ANOVA was applied to compare differences of continuous variables between subgroups. Rates were compared by using the X2 test. Results Compared with the baseline, fasting and 2 h glucose significantly improved at D5 in the two groups, but without further decrease at D14 in the two groups ( t = 4.42, 9.78, 4.00, 8.66 with all P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with the baseline, the fasting insulin significantly decreased at D5 in the HIns group( t =2.07,P 〈0.05). The 2 h insulin level significantly decreased at D5 with further reduction at D14 in the HIns group( F = 24.17,P 〈 0.05 ). No significant decrease was observed with the fasting and 2 h insulin in the NHIns group at D5 and D14. HOMA-IR significantly decreased at D5 in the HIns groups(t = 3.27 ,P 〈 0.05), while showed no change at D5 and D14 in the NHIns group(all P 〉0.05). Gutt insulin sensitivity index increased at D5 in the HIns groups( t = - 9.84, P 〈 0.05 ) with further increase at D14 ( F = 55.96, P 〈 0.05). Compared with the baseline, the Gutt insulin sensitivity index significantly increased at D5 in the NHIns group( t = -4.27, P
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...