输卵管Sonovue超声造影与碘海醇X线造影的对比分析  

Comparison of Sonovue contrast-enhanced ultrasound and lohexol X-ray hysterosalpingogram for fallopian tube assessment

作　　者：王士琴[1] 袁伟[2] 

机构地区：[1]东海县人民医院超声科,江苏222300 [2]东海县人民医院放射科,江苏222300

出　　处：《影像诊断与介入放射学》2013年第4期311-313,共3页Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology

摘　　要：目的比较输卵管Sonovue超声造影与碘海醇X线造影的结果,以期提高超声造影的准确率。方法对45例不孕不育患者,分别在B超下行Sonovue输卵管造影,在X线下行碘剂造影。结果 B超:输卵管通畅者35例(66条),通而不畅7例(13条),不通者7例(10条);X线:输卵管通畅者38例(73条),通而不畅4例(7条),不通者6例(9条)。结论输卵管Sonovue超声造影诊断准确率略低于碘海醇X线造影。Objective To compare Sonovue contrast-enhanced hysterosonography （CEUS） and Iohexol X-ray hysterosalpingography （HSG）. Methods Forty-five patients with infertility underwent CEUS of fallopian tubes using Sonovue followed by Iohexol X-ray HSG. Results Sixty-six fallopian tubes in 35 patients were clearly demonstrated on CEUS. Contrast flow was impeded in 13 tubes of 7 patients. Ten tubes were obstructed in 7 patients. On Iohexol HSG, 73 tubes were clearly demonstrated in 38 patients. Contrast flow was impeded in 7 tubes of 4 patients. Nine tubes were obstructed in 6 patients. Conclusions Sonovue CEUS is slightly less accurate than Iohexol X-ray HSG.

关 键 词：输卵管 SONOVUE 碘海醇 超声 X线 

分 类 号：R711.6[医药卫生—妇产科学]