检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2013年第20期2391-2393,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的 分析探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者在急诊科的临床抢救护理方案.方法 随机选取120例患者分为研究组和对照组,各60例,对照组采取以往传统护理方案,研究组采取抢救护理新方案,将两组急性心肌梗死患者的治疗效果进行比较.结果 研究组患者治愈58例,好转2例,无死亡病例,治愈率为96.67%;对照组治愈45例,好转12例,死亡3例,治愈率为75.00%,研究组抢救成功率明显高于对照组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=12.857,P<0.05).结论 护理新方案对抢救急性心肌梗死患者有较好的效果.Objective To investigate the clinical rescue and nursing plan for the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients in emergency department.Methods Totals of 120 patients with acute myocardial infarction were selected and divided into control group (n =60) and experimental group (n =60) randomly.A new rescue nursing scheme was taken in experimental group,while routine nursing was taken in control group.Then,the effect of treatment was observed and compared between control group and experimental group.Results In experimental group,58 cases were cured,2 improved,no cases was dead,and the cure rate was 96.67%.And 45 cases were cured,12 were improved,3 cases were dead,and the cure rate was 75.00% in control group.The success rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (x2 =12.857,P 〈 0.05).Conclusions The new nursing scheme has good effect on rescuing patients with acute myocardial infarction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249