论我国行政强制执行双轨制的困境与出路  

On Problem and Solution of Two-track System in China’s Administrative Coercion

作　　者：张锦锦[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2013年第3期49-55,共7页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：我国《行政强制法》承继了以申请法院执行为主、以行政机关自行执行为辅的行政强制执行双规制。行政强制执行面临着执行效率不甚理想、执行冲突时有发生、非诉行政执行困难重重的制度困境。针对行政机关自行执行范围过窄、传统强制执行观念牢固、法院办理非诉行政案件缺少协助等困境成因,扩大行政机关自行执行范围、发挥非强制性执行方式实效、完善非诉行政案件协助执行制度已成为走出困境的必由之路。The two-track system of the administrative coercion, i.e. applying for court enforcement being as the base while being supplemented by enforcement by administrative organs, is inherited by China＇s Administrative Coercion Law. There are many problems in such administrative coercion, for instance, low efficiency, high conflict rate, and much difficulty in non-litigation enforcement. Therefore, in order to solve the problems of the narrow scope when enforcing by administrative organs, the entrenched traditional coercion concept, assistance lack in non-litigation by the court, etc., the following three measures must be taken, i.e. the enforcement scope by administrative organs should be enlarged, non-mandatory enforcement methods should be fully displayed, and the assistance system in non-litigation should be imoroved.

关 键 词：行政强制执行 申请法院执行 行政机关自行执行 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]