检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵若焱[1]
机构地区:[1]中国城市规划设计研究院深圳分院,广东深圳 518034
出 处:《城市发展研究》2013年第8期118-121,共4页Urban Development Studies
摘 要:对深圳市更新"协商机制"进行简要介绍,评价深圳城市更新实施效果和博弈结果,重点从协商角度剖析深圳更新政策和制度中存在的问题,包括调控手段单一、缺乏系统指引、经济分析不客观、忽视全程管控,以及忽视低收入群体利益等。并对城市更新制度的完善提出几点建议,包括调整更新机构设施与之职能、制定多元化的利益调控政策、重视片区层面的更新规划、转变经济分析方法、重视低收入群体利益等。The paper gives of brief introduction of "negotiation mechanism" of urban renewal in Shenzhen.It also evaluates the implementation of urban renewal and result of gaming in Shenzhen.The paper analyzes problems in urban renewal policy and institution through negotiation,which include lack of means in regulation,lack of systematic guideline,not objective in economic anlaysis,neglect of procedure control,ignore of low-income people and so on.Moreover,the paper brings out several suggestions on completing policy in urban renewal,which contain adjusting facilities and function of renewal organization,formulating diverse policy on interest regulation,emphasizing district level of renewal plan,converting means of economic analysis,paying attention to low-income people and so on.
分 类 号:TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145