形式平等还是实质公正:法律制度的性别分析  

Formal Equality or Essential Justice:A Gender Analysis of Legal System

作　　者：王郁芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共湖南省委党校湖南行政学院,湖南长沙410006

出　　处：《山东女子学院学报》2013年第4期49-54,共6页Journal of Shandong Women＇s University

基　　金：国家社科基金课题"和谐社会视野下的性别和谐机制研究"(项目编号:10BKS026)

摘　　要：我国对女性的保护已经形成了一个完整的法律体系,女性享有了从基本人权到特殊保护权等较为完善的保护,但是尽管法律的保护在不断加强,女性权益保护的实际却与预期目标存在差距。中性的法律政策所坚持的无差别对待与客观存在的两性差异相背离,相对完善的法律制度与事实上的实施、救济不力形成了鲜明的对照,形式平等和实质平等之间潜在的紧张状态也就愈发显露了出来。平等范围的扩展趋势与女性缺乏权利的现状之间形成了巨大反差,它们的矛盾也日益加大,对女性的不公正问题依然凸显。这在很大程度上源于立法层面性别意识的缺失和偏差。法律的形式平等性与性别的实质公正性的问题值得重视。A favorable legal system for women has been formed in China,and women have enjoyed comparative good protection from basic human rights to special protection.Nevertheless,there is a gap between the present situation and the expected target despite the promotion of legal protection.The objective gender difference departs from the equal treatment advocated by neutral law,moreover,there is a sharp contrast between comparatively perfect legal system and the unfavorable enforcement in practice,thus the potentially intense situation in formal equality and essential justice is exposed.A huge contrast has formed between the extending trend of equality scope and women’s lacking rights situation,the contradiction intensifies,and the injustice for women still highlights.To some extent,those issues originate from the inadequacy and deviation of gender awareness in legal aspect.Thus we should attach importance to the problem of formal equality in law and essential justice in gender.

关 键 词：平等 公正 法律制度 性别 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]