检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州市第一人民医院药剂科,广东广州510180
出 处:《广东药学院学报》2013年第3期302-304,共3页Academic Journal of Guangdong College of Pharmacy
摘 要:目的了解治疗药物血药浓度的监测(TDM)与抗癫药物(AEDs)临床疗效的关系,提高临床个体化用药的合理性。方法采用回顾性调查方法,对我院2012年2月—2013年2月运用均相酶放大免疫法(EMIT)测定的216例次(其中住院患者153例次)应用AED患者的血药浓度结果及其临床疗效进行分析、评价。结果住院患者AED应用的总有效率为68.7%,中毒患者为6.5%,联合用药的患者中,血药浓度高于或低于正常治疗浓度的患者比例达79.5%。结论在应用AED时,不仅应注意血药浓度监测,还应尽量避免多种药物联合应用,并结合其他因素调整用药方案以达到安全、有效、合理应用本类药物。Objective To observe the clinical therapeutic effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) through the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and provide rationally individualized medication. Methods Serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs in 216 patients from February 2012 to February 2013 were measured by homogeneous enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT). Results The total efficiency of antiepileptic drugs was 68.7% ,and the ratio of poisoning patients reached to 6.5%. In patients with combined treatment, the ratio of which blood drug concentrations of AEDs was higher or lower than normal therapy was up to 79. 5%. Conclusion When antiepileptic drugs are applied, blood drug concentrations should be monitored and the combination of multiple drugs should be avoided.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222