制度形式与内容的“变”与“不变”——一种制度变革的理论分析框架  

Form and Content of Institutional“Change”and“Steadiness”:A Theoretical Framework of Analysis

作　　者：叶剑锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北省委党校报刊部,湖北武汉430022

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期753-758,共6页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2012年度国家社会科学基金一般项目课题(12BKS006)

摘　　要：制度变革是人类社会发展的通例。如何促进制度变革,实现国家的善治,是学术研究的一个重要论域。马克思的唯物史观提供了制度变革的宏观历史视野和研究方法,制度经济学丰富了制度变革的微观理论分析框架,但从制度效率维度考察制度变革存在明显的局限性。探讨制度变革,不能仅依据制度效率的维度,而必须引入新的分析工具,这个新的分析框架就是制度内容和制度形式的维度。英国议会的演变历程佐证了制度形式与内容的"变"与"不变",而中国改革开放中的渐进主义则回答了制度变革的理想方式问题。The institutional change is a common practice in the development of human society. How to promote the institutional change to achieve good governance of the country is an important academic research field. Marx＇s historical materialism provides the institutional change of macroscopic historical perspective and research method, and institutional economics framework enriches the theory of insti- tutional change of microscopic points, but inspecting institutional change from the dimension of sys tem efficiency exists obvious limitations. Therefore,discussing institutional change should not only be on the basis of dimensions of system efficiency, but also introduce new analytic tools,i, e. the new a nalysis framework involves the dimensions of system content and form. The evolution course of the British parliament system supporting the form and content of ＂change＂ and ＂steadiness＂, but China＇s reform and opening up of the gradualism is an ideal way to answer the question of the way of institu- tional change.

关 键 词：制度变革 制度形式 制度内容 渐进式变革 英国议会 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学] D033