经济增长的市场化效应与集群化效应比较——对广东和山东样本数据的分析  

The Comparison between Marketization and Clusterization Effects on Economic Growth: An Analysis Based on Guangdong and Shandong Province's Sampled Data

作　　者：张少辉[1] 李冠霖[2] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学管理学院,广东广州510275 [2]华南理工大学经济与贸易学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期45-49,共5页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"服务业发展与城市群演进的互动机制研究"(11BJL063)

摘　　要：文章测算了广东和山东2000-2010年的市场化指数和产业集群度,并以萨缪尔森模型为基础,引入市场化和集群化程度变量,比较了两省经济增长的市场化效应和集群化效应。分析表明,进入21世纪以来,与市场化因素相比,广东产业集群度高于山东是广东经济增长快于山东的主要原因,集群化的经济增长贡献率远大于市场化的贡献率,而且集群化还有很大的拓展空间。在地区市场化差异程度越来越小的今天,地方政府应加快出台产业集群政策,引导产业从集聚向集群方向发展,促进经济持续稳定增长。This paper estimates Guangdong and Shandong＇ s marketization indexes and industrial cluster degrees to analyze their impacts on economic growth based on Samuelson model which induces maketization variable and clusterization variable. The analysis shows that clusterization advantage is the main reason why Guangdong＇ s economic growth has been higher than Shandong＇ s since entering 21th century compared with marketization factor, clusterization＇ s economic growth contribution rate is much higher than marketization＇ s, and clusterization has unlimited room to expand. Today, differences of marketization among regions are increasingly smaller, local governments should speed up the introduction of cluster policies to guide the direction of industrial development from agglomeration to cluster, to promote sustainable economic growth.

关 键 词：经济增长 市场化 集群化 萨缪尔森模型 

分 类 号：F026.9[经济管理—政治经济学]