科技期刊学术论文基金标注的审核策略  

The Editing Policy for Fund Footnotes in Academic Papers

作　　者：余毅[1] 吴学军[2] 周俊[1] 杨琪[1] 

机构地区：[1]<四川师范大学学报(自然科学版)>编辑部,成都610066 [2]<上海电机学院学报>编辑部,上海201306

出　　处：《成都工业学院学报》2013年第3期56-58,共3页Journal of Chengdu Technological University

基　　金：四川省教育厅重点基金课题(13SA0179);上海市高等学校科技期刊研究会基金课题(SHGX2012B05)

摘　　要：科技期刊刊发基金标注论文日渐增多,基金标注不端现象日益显现。深受科技期刊和编辑喜爱的基金论文常成为编辑部审核的盲区,探讨了伪基金论文的三种主要表现形式,分析了论文乱挂基金项目的四大危害,同时,提出了解决论文基金标注不端的五大策略,正确面对学术的严肃与公正,达到抑制论文基金标注不端的目的。There is an increasing number of fund footnotes in scientific papers, and the misconducting in this area increases. Papers and articles with fund footnotes are interested to editors. Therefore, a blind zone of reviewing exists in this area. This paper summarizes three forms of pseudo information in fund footnotes, and four major downsides in projects with false funding. Meanwhile, five strategies are given to solve this problem so as to stop the academic misconducts.

关 键 词：基金标注 学术论文 责任编辑 科技期刊 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]