拒不支付劳动报酬罪司法解释介评  

Introduction and Review of Judicial Explanation for Refusing to Pay Labor Remuneration Crime

作　　者：王胜华[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2013年第4期86-90,共5页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(12SFB5024)

摘　　要：刑法修正案(八)将恶意欠薪行为入罪后,由于其司法适用标准缺乏明确性而在现实中几乎被虚置。最高人民法院穿行在法意和民意之间,于2013年1月23日发布了《关于审理拒不支付劳动报酬刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》,明确了拒不支付劳动报酬罪的定罪量刑标准,这为司法人员广为褒扬。但该司法解释仍美中不足,司法人员应当理性看待,在用准用好的基础上还需恰当行使自由裁量权,对有争议或未规定的情形作出正义的解释。After the eighth criminal law amendment regulated the act of refusing to pay wages deliberately as a crime, the sin was almost vacuous owing to lack of clarity of judicial standards. The People＇s Supreme Court, on January 23, 2013, considered between the spirit of law and the will of the people, publicized the Explanation for Issues of Applica- ble Laws for Court to Solve Criminal Case of Refusing to Pay Labor Remuneration, and made explicitly the criterion of convicting and sentencing for this kind of case. The Explanation has been highly praised by judicial officers. However, the judicial explanation has still some imperfections. Judicial officers should treat it rationally, exercise discretion correctly based on accurate and good application, and give a just explanation for controversial or unspecified conditions.

关 键 词：拒不支付劳动报酬罪 恶意欠薪 司法解释 宽严相济 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]