情绪抑制与表达对运动员自我控制损耗的影响  

Effect of Emotion Suppression and Expression on Athletes' Ego-depletion

作　　者：张连成[1] 张力为[2] 高淑青[2] 刘嘉蕙[2] 

机构地区：[1]天津体育学院健康与运动科学系,天津300381 [2]北京体育大学,北京100084

出　　处：《北京体育大学学报》2013年第8期77-82,共6页Journal of Beijing Sport University

基　　金：天津体育学院2012年青年科研基金资助项目;天津体育学院博士科研启动项目

摘　　要：目的:通过两个实验检验了情绪抑制与表达对运动员自我控制损耗的影响。方法:有38名足球专项大学生参与了实验1,有15名网球、3名羽毛球和11名乒乓球专项大学生参与了实验2,他们被随机分配到情绪抑制、情绪表达以及控制组中。所有参与者先完成8 min30 s秒的情绪控制任务,然后实验1的参与者完成Stroop任务,实验2的参与者完成Visual-CCPT任务。结果:情绪抑制组较简单观看组以及情绪表达组在Stroop不一致任务的错误数上更高,在Visual-CCPT任务的虚报数上更高。结论:对于消极情绪采取情绪表达的方式更有利于后继任务的控制表现,这提示运动员,在面对消极情绪时,应该视情况去表达,这样才能节省自我控制能量,为后续自我控制任务的顺利完成提供能量保证。Objective： Two experiments were conducted to test the effect of emotion suppression and expression on athletes＇ ego-depletion. Methods： Thirty-eight football collegiate students participated in Experiment 1. 15 ten-nis, 3 badminton, and 11 table tennis collegiate students participated in Experiment 2. They were randomly allo-cated to （a） emotion suppression group, （b） emotion expression group, and （c） the control group. After 8 mi- nutes and 30 seconds of emotion control task, and those participated in Experiment 1 finished the Stroop task, those participated in Experiment 2 finished the Visual-CCPT task. Results： MANOVA Results showed that emo-tion suppression group has more error numbers of unmatched Stroop task and more commission numbers of Visual- CCPT task than control group and emotion expression group. Conclusions：Suppressing negative emotion is a worse strategy when making a comparison to expressing. These results suggested that when athletes faced negative emo-tions, emotion expression would be the best choice. This strategy can save energy and give guarantee for subse-quent control task.

关 键 词：自我控制 自我控制损耗 运动员 情绪抑制 情绪表达 

分 类 号：G804.8[文化科学—运动人体科学]