检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张波
机构地区:[1]浦东新区行政学院,上海201210
出 处:《中国卫生政策研究》2013年第8期53-57,共5页Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(09ASH002);上海市委党校系统课题(12S&DX051)
摘 要:目的:研究浦东全科医生家庭责任制度的认同度及影响因素,为家庭医生制度的进一步推广提供可行性建议。方法:对浦东试点街镇的597例患者和120名医生就全科医生的认同参与情况进行问卷调查。结果:患者和医生对全科医生家庭职责制的认同度普遍不高,仅有50.4%的医生和78.5%的患者支持全科医生制度的推行。全科医生对报酬收入(6.1%)、奖惩制度(16.8%)、福利保障(19.1%)满意度较低,但对领导素质、人际关系和单位管理状况等满意度普遍较高。结论:浦东全科医生的社会认同度、职业认同度明显较低,需要加强舆论宣传引导力度、加大相关配套政策支持力度、加强人才队伍建设和提升全科医生的服务能力,这是进一步推广全科医生责任制的关键和有力保障。Objective: To study the identification and influencing factors of the GPs Family Responsibility System in Pudong New Area of Shanghai, and to suggest feasible ways of further popularizing the system. Methods: 597 patients in Pudong pilot streets/towns and 120 doctors in the GPs Family Responsibility System were surveyed by questionnaire. Results: Recognition of the GPs Family Responsibility System was not high. Only 50.4% of doctors and 78.5% of patients supported the system. In terms of income, the satisfaction level was 6.1%; in terms of rewards and punishments, the satisfaction level was 16.8%; and in terms of social security, the satisfaction level was 191%. These are relatively low satisfaction levels. However, GPs were more satisfied with the quality of leadership, interpersonal relationships, and management. Conclusion: The Pudong GPs social and occupation identification degree was low. Propaganda and relevant supporting policies need to be strengthened, and a talented team needs to be established. The ability of GPs to provide service also needs to be improved.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249