污染环境罪的立法缺失及司法解释补救——兼评《中华人民共和国刑法》第338条  

Legislation Defect and Remedy of the Environmental Pollution Offense: Review the Section 338 of Criminal Law

作　　者：王江[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400030

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第4期133-136,共4页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(2007JJD810167);国家社科基金项目"生态利益衡平的法制保障研究"(12BFX120)联合资助

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国刑法(修正案八)》对《刑法》第338条进行了大幅修改。这次修改降低了"污染环境罪"的入罪门槛,扩大了其适用范围,增强了刑法在惩治环境污染行为方面的威慑力。但是,本次修改仍有不少疏漏之处。例如,《刑法修正案(八)并未给出"严重污染环境"的判断标准,也未明确"有害物质"的范围,其量刑设计也沿用原"重大环境污染事故罪"的规定,并未结合实践需要进行适当调整。"两高"应采用司法解释的方式,对本次修改存在的诸多疏漏予以补救,以回应司法实践的需要,更好地发挥刑法在打击环境犯罪,保护环境法益方面的功能和作用。The section 338 of the criminal law has be modified by the ＂criminal law （ amendment viii） ＂. With the modification, the incriminate threshold of pollution environmental crimes has been reduced, the scope of the environ- mental crimes has been expanded too. And also, the deterrence has enhanced by this modification. But, the criminal law amendment has not only given the criteria of the serious pollution of the environment, but also explicitly given the range of ＂hazardous substances＂. Besides, the sentencing of the crime is also unreasonable. Therefore, there are still many missings in this modification. It is necessary to remedy of the missings by the way of judicial interpretation.

关 键 词：污染环境罪 立法缺失 司法解释 

分 类 号：D924.399[政治法律—刑法学]