法律修辞说服理论的语用有效性分析  

The Analysis of Pragmatics Validity in Legal Rhetoric Persuading Theory

作　　者：张传新[1] 宋保振[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学(威海)法学院,山东威海264209

出　　处：《天津法学》2013年第3期5-9,共5页Tianjin Legal Science

基　　金：博士后基金项目"融合逻辑与经验的法律论辩模型研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号:2012M511470;山东大学研究生科研创新项目"法律修辞及其影响"的阶段性成果;项目编号:yjs001

摘　　要：作为对司法过程中价值因素予以较多关注的法律修辞方法,其本身修辞论证过程就是一种建立在语用学转向基础之上的说服性实践论辩。因为无论微观修辞技巧还是宏观修辞论证,都是一种语用型式的表达,论辩中的语用有效性是修辞说服的主要理论依据。这体现在两个方面:一是通过对语境的分析和把握拓展着有效性概念的理解,使对案件的分析由静态关注转向动态研究;二是主体间性共识的达成,保证判决得出作为"好论证"而具有更强的可接受性。Since the legal rhetoric method is concerning more value factors in the judicial process, the rhetori- cal argumentation itself is a persuasive practical argument on the basis of the pragmaties turning. As no matter the micro rhetoric technique or macro rhetoric argumentation is an expression of pragmatic style, the pragmat- its validity reflected in argument is the main theoretical basis of rhetoric persuading. The validity is reflected in two aspects： firstly, the analysis of context expands the understanding of validity involving the case analysis turning from the static concern to dynamic studies; secondly, the inter-subjective consensus has been reached ensuring the sentence being stronger acceptability as a good argumentation.

关 键 词：法律方法 法律修辞 语用-论辩 语用有效性 

分 类 号：D90-055[政治法律—法学理论]