检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龙跃[1,2]
机构地区:[1]重庆工商大学商务策划学院 [2]电子商务及供应链系统重庆市重点实验室,重庆400067
出 处:《软科学》2013年第9期84-89,共6页Soft Science
基 金:重庆市教委科学技术研究项目(KJ120730);重庆市高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划(渝教人〔2011〕65号);电子商务及供应链系统重庆市重点实验室专项基金项目(2012ECSC0201)
摘 要:将合作创新中的决策方式分为坚持合作与中途违约,对比分析了两种创新方式下的利润,从演化博弈的角度分析了合作不溢出和合作溢出下的企业决策演化过程,并通过仿真算例进行了验证。结果表明:有限理性下的竞争性联盟成员创新决策演化过程中,合作创新主体吸收能力越强,越有利于整体利益的增加;适当调整合作违约金和利益分配比例,有利于控制合作创新中的机会主义行为,提高资源社会化配置效益。Decision-making in cooperative innovation was divided into two modes of collaboration and default in this paper. The profit under these two modes was calculated out and compared. The decision-making evolution process under these two modes was discussed from the perspective of evolutionary game. And a simulation example has been verified. The result shows that in the decision-making evolution process in competitive alliance within the framework of bounded rationality, the stronger the absorptive capacity of cooperative enterprises is the more increase overall interests promote. The opportunistic behavior in collaborative technological innovation can be controlled by adjusting the ratio of interest distribution and the a- mount of penalty, which would promote the collaborative decision-making and improve resource social allocation efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145