检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘攀[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海201620
出 处:《武汉商业服务学院学报》2013年第4期87-89,共3页Journal of Wuhan Commercial Service College
摘 要:一般认为,第三人侵害债权是指债的关系以外的第三人故意实施或与债务人恶意通谋实施旨在侵害债权人债权的行为并造成债权人损害。由于第三人侵害债权将债权纳入侵权法的调整范围,它突破了传统民法理论上债的相对性原则,形成了合同法与侵权法的交错,一直是民法界长期争论的热点问题。中国在《合同法》的制定过程中没有采纳第三人侵害债权制度,现行法中也无具体条文规定该制度,从理论上探讨此项制度则具有了重要的现实意义。As to the third party's infringement on creditor's right, for the reality that it has brought the creditor' s right into the tort law remedies which breaks the relativity debt principle of the traditional civil law theory, forming an overlapping between the Contract law and Tort law, and this has been a hot issues for a long time in the civil law sector. During the process of making the "Contract Law", China did not adopt the principle of " a third party against claims of the creditor ", and there are no specific provisions in the existing legislation system. Therefore, investigating this system theoretically has important practical significance.
关 键 词:第三人侵害债权相对性
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33