新旧《五代史》编纂异同之比较  

The Similarities and Differences between JIUWUDAISHI and XINWUDAISHI

作　　者：姜海军[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院,北京100875

出　　处：《史学史研究》2013年第3期27-36,共10页Journal of Historiography

摘　　要：新旧《五代史》均成书于北宋时期,是记载五代十国历史的基本文献,但两史在诸多方面存在着差异。它们之间的差异不仅仅体现在成书历程、编纂体例、史料择取、叙事风格等方面,而且体现在它们内在的思想观念上。它们之间的差别尽管有史学思想本身演进的原因,但最为根本的乃是源于唐宋社会变革下的经学及其所代表的思想文化体系的转型。毕竟,经学作为儒学的基本表现形式,是当时的社会意识形态,它左右着史学及其观念。可以说,新旧《五代史》分别处于两个时代,是汉唐注疏之学(汉学)与宋代义理之学(宋学)两种经学范式及其所代表的文化体系的具体体现。As the main literature about Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms, both JIUWUDAISHI and XINWUDAISHI were published in the Northern Song Dynasty, but they are different not only in the completion process, compiling style, historical data choosing and narrative style, but also in the internal ideas. Their being different is in part due to the historical ideas evolution per se, but mainly due to the transformation of Confucian classics study and the cultural system it represent with the social transition from Tang to Song. After all, as the social ideology, Confucian classics study decides historiography. It can be said that JIUWUDAISHI and XINWUDAISHI are respectively the manifestations of commentaries Learning （Han school） and Yi Li Theory （Song school） and the cultural systems they represent.

关 键 词：《旧五代史》 《新五代史》 欧阳修 薛居正 宋代经学 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]