检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛延生[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工程大学外语系,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《天津外国语大学学报》2013年第5期1-8,共8页Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
基 金:2012年度教育部人文社科项目(12YJC740077);2013年度中央高校基础科研项目(HEUCF131202);哈尔滨工程大学引进人才项目(HEUCFR1131)
摘 要:鉴于当下语言适应论的发展境遇,结合其核心概念"适应"所预设的进化认识论视角对这一研究范式展开批评性分析。结果发现,未来语言适应论研究需要注意以下三个问题:就认识论的基本前提而言,适应论研究需要区分适应论的经验论解读与方法论解读;就认识论的发生逻辑而言,适应论研究需要突破简单性逻辑禁锢,重视复杂性逻辑底蕴;就认识论的科学标准而言,适应论研究需要重视应用性例证检验,力求建构例证效度检验标准。学界参照生物进化领域的适应性研究模式,可以了解语言适应性研究的未来走向。While giving full concern to the bottlenecks confronted linguistic adaptation theory (LA T ), mls paper here is intended to conduct a critical analysis of LAT through focusing the evolutionary epistemology perspective presupposed in the key notion of adaptation in LAT. As a result, the following three points are concluded as implications for the further development of LAT: first, regarding the basic foundations of epistemology, a tentative distinction should be conducted between the empirical and methodological understanding of adaptation in LAT; second, in terms of the triggering logic of epistemology, reductive logic has to give place to the complex one; third, concerning the scientific criteria of epistemology, it is no fault to give applicative exemplification obvious priority in order to map out the construction of validity testing criteria. Last but not least, it is figured out that LAT can develop further with a promising future with regard to scientificity if taking reference from the adaptive development in biology and evolutionary epistemology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40