农民工城市融合的测度:一个理论延展  

A Theoretical Extension of the Measure of Urban Integration of Migrant Workers

作　　者：韩俊强[1] 孟颖颖[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学社会保障研究中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第5期147-152,共6页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(11CGL066);国家社会科学规划基金重点项目(11AZD023);2012年度武汉大学人文社会科学自主科研项目(2012YB068)

摘　　要：由于社会融合测量的不同维度及每一个维度测量指标之间的差异,目前国内外学者们对如何解构社会融合的维度并未形成统一的意见,也未能找到具有共识性的测量工具。从国内有关研究农民工城市融合程度测量方法与工具的成果来看,测量内容、测量形式和技术方法上的复杂性、多样性已经使得农民工城市融合程度的测度成为近年来中国农民工城市融入问题的研究难点与重点。从整体来看,相关研究已经通过对零散的、缺乏内在逻辑的单个评价指标进行衡量,发展到基于特定的理论框架构建独立的指标体系进行测度,呈现出测度指标更为科学、全面,评价结果更为客观的主要特点,但其中仍存在主客观测度指标界定不清晰、缺乏对融合过程的动态考察等问题。Because of the different measuring dimensions of social integration and the differences between different measuring dimensions, the scholars so far have not agreed on the how to deconstruct the social integration dimension and have not found out the measurement tool. From the result of the tool and the measurement of the integration of the farmers with the city, the complexity of the measuring content, forms and the methods and the diversity of the migrant workers in the city have made it important and difficult. Overall, the research has been fragmented by the lack of internal logic of a single evaluation measure, the development of a theoretical framework based on a specific index system to build a separate measure, shows a more specific measure index, a comprehensive evaluation result and the more features of a more objectivity, but there is still no clear definition of subjective and objective measure- ment indicators, the lack of integration of the dynamic process of investigation and other issues.

关 键 词：城市融合 测度农民工 文献综述 

分 类 号：F840.684[经济管理—保险]