检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊雯[1]
出 处:《当代医学》2013年第28期36-38,共3页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的研究产前超声检查对胎儿泌尿系统畸形的诊断价值,对比超声和MRI对胎儿泌尿系统畸形的检查准确率。方法对2008年2月-2012年8月检出的胎儿泌尿系统畸形的35例临床资料进行回顾性分析,所有患者均进行了产前超声检查与MRI检查,分析产前超声检查对胎儿泌尿系统畸形的诊断价值与MRI是否存在差异,并总结不同类型泌尿系统畸形的超声特点。结果 35例畸形中使用超声检出31例,使用MRI诊断30例,两种方法比较无明显差异,P>0.05;35例畸形包括:病理性肾积水最多,为17例,其次为多囊性肾发育不良,为5例,组间比较,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论使用产前超声检查对胎儿泌尿系统畸形具有较好的诊断价值,能够检出多种畸形情况,值得应用。Objective To study prenatal ultrasound examination of the fetal urinary tract malformations diagnostic value of contrast ultrasound and MR] of the fetal urinary tract malformations check the accuracy. Methods In our hospital from February 2008 to August 2012 the detection of fetal urinary tract malformations 35 cases were analyzed retrospectively, all patients underwent prenatal ultrasound and MRI analysis of prenatal ultrasound of fetal urinary Department of malformations diagnostic value of MRI whether there are differences, and summarize the ultrasound characteristics of the different types of urinary tract malformations. Results 35 cases of the malformation use ultrasound detected 31 cases, the use of MR] diagnosis of 30 cases, the two methods showed no significant difference, P〉0.05, the difference was not statistically significant; 35 cases of malformation include: pathological hydronephrosis up 17 cases, followed by to polycystic God renal dysplasia, five cases between the two groups (P〈0.05), the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion The use of prenatal ultrasound has better diagnostic value of fetal urinary system malformations, able to detect a variety of malformations, worthy of application.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R714.5[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.76.4