检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈芹芹[1] 夏新华[1] 颜红[1] 雷昌[1] 黄玛莎[1] 彭买娇[1]
出 处:《中国实验方剂学杂志》2013年第18期13-16,共4页Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(30973955)
摘 要:目的:探索壳聚糖絮凝澄清工艺与醇沉工艺对中药水提浸膏吸湿性影响的差异。方法:考察2种纯化工艺对浸膏得率、糖类和氨基酸保留率、蛋白质和鞣质去除率、浸膏吸湿性的影响。结果:壳聚糖絮凝澄清工艺的浸膏得率、糖类和氨基酸保留率、蛋白质和鞣质去除率均高于醇沉工艺,但浸膏吸湿性低于醇沉工艺。结论:金钱草水提浸膏的吸湿性与多糖保留率、蛋白和鞣质去除率有关,为2种纯化工艺的选用提供依据。Objective: To explore differences between effects of chitosan flocculation clarification technology and alcohol precipitation technology on moisture absorption of water extract of Chinese medicinal herb.Method: Influences of two purification processes were investigated on extract yield,retention rates of carbohydrates and amino acids,removal rates of proteins and tannins,hygroscopicity of dry extracts.Result: Extract yield,retention rates of carbohydrates and amino acids,removal rates of proteins and tannin in chitosan flocculation clarification process were higher than that in alcohol precipitation process,but hygroscopicity of dry extracts was opposite.Conclusion: Moisture absorption of water extract of Lysimachiae Herba had relationship with retention rate of polysaccharides,removal rates of protein and tannin,it could provide the basis for selection of these two kinds of purification processes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171