论盖里森的科学仪器史与科学仪器哲学  

On Peter Galison's History and Philosophy of Scientific Instruments

作　　者：石诚[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京理工大学马克思主义理论教学研究部,南京210094

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2013年第5期57-61,共5页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"科学哲学视域下的科学仪器考察"(10YJC720033);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(NUST2012YBXM069;NUST 2011PYXM11)

摘　　要：盖里森纠正了以往科学史与科学哲学对科学仪器的忽视。与库恩提出观念与概念驱动的科学革命相对,盖里森的科学仪器史突出仪器与工具驱动的科学革命。通过批判库恩与皮克林对科学发展模式中仪器的定位,盖里森的科学仪器哲学明确了仪器与理论、实验同样重要的哲学地位。盖里森的科学仪器史与科学仪器哲学研究开创了科学史与科学哲学对于仪器研究的新局面。Peter Galison corrected the neglect of scientific instruments in the field of history and philosophy of science.Thomas Kun proposed that scientific revolutions were driven by idea and concept,while Galison thought scientific revolutions are driven by instruments tools.By criticizing Kuhn and Andrew Pickering in the localization of instrument to scientific progress pattern,Galison argued that instruments,theories and experiment have similar important philosophical status.Galison＇s work has made scientific instruments research go into a new level in the field of history and philosophy of science.

关 键 词：科学仪器史 科学仪器哲学 不可通约性 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]