检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晴晴[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学信息管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080
出 处:《图书馆》2013年第5期12-15,共4页Library
摘 要:以中美图书馆法规关于公共图书馆设置问题的规定为分析对象,利用话语分析方法进行比较论述,指出两国公共图书馆在设置主体、设置依据和设置模式等话语上存在显著差异。美国公共图书馆设置话语体现"主权在民"的制度理念;中国公共图书馆设置话语则体现行政主导的集权理念。深入解析两国不同公共图书馆设置话语及蕴涵其中的权力意志,有助于反思不同话语"真实"及其支配下的公共图书馆实践。By discourses analysis about the regulations on the problem of public library setting of library laws of China and the US and this paper points out that There are huge differences in setting discourses of the two countries such as setting bodies, ba- sis and patterns. Discourses of public library setting in the US reflect the system idea of "sovereignty in citizen", while the discour- ses in China reflect the centralized concept of executive - led. Deeply interpreting the different discourses of public library setting and the will to power implicated in them between China and the US, we can rethink the different discourse "truth" and public library practice dominating by it profoundly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7