论公民服公职权的正当限制——兼与李少文同学商榷  

On the Limitation of Citizens,Right to Take Government Service——And debate with Li Shao-wen

作　　者：高景芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第9期44-51,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金第52批面上资助项目<多元视角下的职业行政许可制度研究>(2012M520794);2012年度河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究重点项目<职业行政许可制度的法经济学解释>(SD121002);河北科技大学博士科研启动基金资助项目<职业自由论--一个宪法学的视角>(QD201201)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：公民服公职权具有相对性,可以通过法律对其予以限制。我国在中央机关公务员报考条件中设置的两年基层工作经历的限制,是为了增强中央机关公务员对基层工作的了解,以提高其服务水平和服务能力,具有目的适当性;比较而言,尚无其他途径可资利用以达到同样效果,故这种限制有其必要性;同时,这一限制的手段与目的之间也大体体现了均衡性。因此,这一限制符合比例原则,系对公民服公职权的限制,而非歧视,具有实质正当性。但是,从目前来看,这一限制违反了法律保留原则,缺乏形式合法性,应当通过立法予以改进。Citizens,right to take government service has the relativity,It can be limited through the law.Conditions for civil servants in the central government in China to enter oneself for an examination in the two years of grass-roots work experience,is a civil servants in order to enhance the understanding of the work at the grass-roots level,to improve its service level and service capabilities,has a purpose appropriateness;In comparison,there is no other way available to achieve the same effect,so this limitation has its necessity;At the same time,the restrictions also largely reflects the balance between means and purpose.This limitation,therefore,conform to the principle of proportion with nondiscrimination and has substantial justification.So far,however,this restriction in violation of the law reservation principle,the lack of legitimacy in form,should be improved through legislation.

关 键 词：服公职权 正当限制 两年基层工作经历 

分 类 号：DF31[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]