存在独立的律师职业伦理吗?  

Is Lawyers' Professional Ethics Independent?

作　　者：马驰[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学法学院,天津300134

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第9期111-118,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：天津市哲学社科规划项目<社会冲突中的律师角色>(TJFX12-015)

摘　　要：现代律师职业伦理的困境在于由党派性原则和中立性原则引发的普遍伦理与特殊职业要求间的冲突。不能借由此种冲突认定,存在某种独立于普遍伦理的律师职业伦理。现代律师职业伦理的规则化和角色道德理论并不支持此种独立。律师职业伦理应当被视为普遍伦理在律师活动中复杂适用的结果。在理论上确定律师职业伦理的非独立性,有利于保证律师时刻保持道德的敏感性,防止因律师自治而丧失自律。The dilemma in modern lawyers ＇ professional ethics roots in a conflict between common ethic and particular professional demands.The conflict can not deduce that there is a lawyers＇ professional ethics which is independent of common ethics.Also,regularization of modern lawyers＇ professional ethics and the Theory of Role do not sustain the independence.The lawyers＇ professional ethics should be viewed as results of application of common ethics in lawyers＇ fields.Theoretically,the dependence of lawyers＇ professional ethics bring in more sensitivity when lawyers face the ethics situation,which avoids lawyers missing the self-discipline on the excuse of the autonomy.

关 键 词：律师职业伦理 冲突 独立 

分 类 号：DF85[政治法律—法学]