公民救助保护的立法模式选择  

Choice of Legislative Model of Protection to Citizen Assistance

作　　者：李克杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院法学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《河北法学》2013年第10期46-55,共10页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：2013年度国家社科基金项目<我国社会法的范畴与体系研究>(13BFX143)的阶段性成果;2012年度山东省高校人文社会科学研究计划项目<公民救助行为法律保护问题研究>(J12WB06)的研究成果之一

摘　　要：各类社会风险"变现"的现实危险和实际损害,许多情况下都落到公民个人身上,直接威胁公民的人身和财产安全,而政府救助至少要在十分钟之后到达,这凸显了公民救助的重要性和必要性。同时,公民救助的巨大风险远远超出了道德的调整能力,呼唤法律对其进行有效保护。面对公民救助法律保护的我国现有制度和欧美不同模式,我们应在分清利弊、借鉴经验的基础上,结合道德发展和社会保障水平,选择"第三种模式"来规制公民救助。国家层面不必制定见义勇为保障法,而应制定调整范围更大的公民救助保护法。The real risk and actual damage of all kinds of social risk ＂ realization＂ is happening directly to civil person in many cases. It will be a direct threat to the personal safety and property of the citizens. But the government rescue should arrive after ten minutes at least. And this highlights the importance and necessity of citizen assistance. At the same time, citizen assistance risks far beyond their moral adjustment ability. And then, we need the effective legal protection to citizen assistance. In the face of the different legal protection pattern about citizen assistance, we should distinguish advantages and disadvantages on the basis of experience, combined with the moral development and the level of social security, select ＂third models＂ to regulate citizen assistance.

关 键 词：公民救助 法律风险 法律保护 立法模式 

分 类 号：DF391.3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]