检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董静[1]
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第5期500-505,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(860479);兰州大学人文;社会科学学科建设基金资助项目(870868)
摘 要:参考萨拉蒙对政府与民间组织关系的分类思路,将政府绩效评估分为科层、参与、合作、治理、独立五种模式,以我国地方政府绩效评估实践中24个典型案例为样本,将其进行模式划分并通过剖析这些案例在行政层级、绩效评估周期、持续时间、组织机构、评估主体、评估方式、结果运用等主要维度上的分布状况及特征,研究了上述五种模式在我国实践中的应用及发展状况,以从整体上把握我国地方政府绩效评估现状及问题所在,并提出了我国政府绩效评估各模式的发展趋向及未来的研究展望。Referring to Salamon's classification of the relationship between governments and non- governmental organizations, this paper divides government performance evaluation into five modes including hierarchy evaluation, participation evaluation, cooperation evaluation, independence evaluation and governance evaluation. Then it selects 24 typical practice cases of China's local governments and analyzes them in such dimensions as administrative level, performance evaluation cycle, duration, organizational setup, evaluator, assessment method and result application. By studying the five modes in the practice cases, it is intended to explore the current status and problems of China's local governments' performance evaluation on the whole. Finally, this paper attempts to predict the development tendency of these modes in China and provides some suggestions for future research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15