检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王传思[1] 谢贻祥[1] 郑学海[1] 黄鸿武[1] 王永森[1] 吴永军[1] 姚磊
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属六安医院肛肠外科,安徽合肥237005
出 处:《结直肠肛门外科》2013年第3期144-146,共3页Journal of Colorectal & Anal Surgery
基 金:安徽省高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2013Z144)
摘 要:目的探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术(PPH)Ⅰ期治疗急性嵌顿性痔的临床疗效。方法 40例已行手术治疗急性嵌顿痔患者根据术式分为PPH组(20例)和MMH组(20例),对两组患者手术时间、术后VAS评分、术后出血、肛缘水肿、住院时间及住院费用进行比较分析。结果手术后两组患者预后良好,无严重并发症,PPH组住院费用多于MMH组(P<0.01),但在手术时间、术后疼痛的VAS评分、术后并发症(肛缘水肿)发生率及住院时间方面PPH组优于MMH组(P<0.01)。结论 PPH治疗急性嵌顿痔安全有效,且近期疗效优于MMH。Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of treating one stage PPH for acute incarcerated hem- orrhoids (AIH }. Methods A retrospective study of 40 patients with AIH treated by surgery was per- formed. The patients were divided into PPH group( n :20) and MMH group( n :20) according to the different operation program who underwent. Operative time, pain score of VAS, postoperative complica- tions, hospital stay, and hospital charges were compared. Results The symptoms were both relieved in two groups patients. Although the hospital charges of patients in MMH group were fewer, the patients in PPH group had advantages of shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, fewer complications(edema of a- nal edge), and shorter hospital stay ( P 〈0.01). Conclusion One stage PPH is a safe and effective treat- ment for AIH, and furthermore its short-term therapeutic effect is better than MMH.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30