论辩视域内的“历史终结论”:德里达与福山之争  

“The end of history ”under the perspective of debate: Derrida and Fukuyama

作　　者：王霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南师范大学文学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《北方论丛》2013年第5期80-84,共5页The Northern Forum

基　　金：云南省哲学社会科学规划项目(项目批准号:QN2013050)

摘　　要：德里达与福山关于历史是否有终结这一问题曾展开激烈的论争,在学术基本立场上,德里达与福山之间存在针锋相对的方法和观点分歧。但德里达的解构方法与福山的"终结论"之间并非一种截然对立的关系,德里达并不完全反对历史性的承诺,关键在于允诺要兑现,要有行动、实践。德里达之所以反对福山,更在于反对其乐观与武断。德里达与福山之间的思想有融合之处,都是要回答在现代性的语境中,人类如何生活得更好。Jacques Derrida and Francis Fukuyama have had an intense debate about the problem of ＂the end of history＂. On the basic academic position, their methods and ideas are different. However, the relationship between Derrida ~ method of deconstruction and Fukuyaroa ＇ theory of ＂the end of history＂ are not completely opposite. Derrida is not totally against historic commitment . The key of the problem is that commitment must be achieved and there should be action and practice. Den-ida is against Fukuyama because Fukuyama＇ optimistic and arbitrary stance. They have something in common. They are beth to answer the question of how people could live better in tile context of modernity.

关 键 词：历史终结论 德里达 福山 

分 类 号：K01[历史地理—历史学]